SAMUEL JOHNSON on HENRY KISSINGER

... So I'm researching Henry Kissinger for a non-fiction comic on the Middle East-- specifically Kissinger's comment, after inciting the Kurds to rebel against Iraq and then leaving them undefended against Saddam Hussein, "Covert action should not be confused with missionary work."
... and I stumble across this by Dr. Johnson: "Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful."

Why is Henry Kissinger considered a deep thinker? Because everyone says so. Why is his supposed intelligence (to paraphrase) "respected by friends and foes alike"? Because everyone says so.

I put it to you that a diplomat who leaves almost a million people dead in his wake is not a successful diplomat, but a master of public relations and image enhancement.

But then, I'm not as smart as Dr. Kissinger, and consequently have no right to criticize or question. How do I know this? Everyone says so. It's a common assumption.

Arguably, the deluded naked emperor was better educated and more experienced than the rude child who pointed and jeered at the pimples on the emperor's pasty ass. Everyone says so. It's a common assumption. I'd just like someone to do the math some day comparing the number of lives Kissinger saved while making the world safe for American interests, and the numbers killed directly or indirectly by his arrogant decisions. Kind of like a Nobel Prize earned run average.

2 comments:

Shimmy said...

Henry Kissinger dismissed Murray Slaughter with a wave of his meaty hands!

--Shimmy

Ormondroyd's Encyclopedia Esoterica said...

... but Murray, beng fictional, never killed anyone or left anyone to die. Kissinger's self-aggrandizing terms as Secretary of State left a good many people needlessly dead in Cambodia, in Chile, in Kurdistan, all for the sake of some obscure connection in his mind with the Cold War against Russia and China. But he, he is a great man, because everyone says so.